A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
Blog Article
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It can be nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
The focus is around the intention to cause injury. This is usually a major dilemma: a particularly very low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not apply, since the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, somewhat he is acquitted with the criminal charges based on evidence and it is nicely-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted while in the criminal case, then on this pretty charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment because of the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all foreseeable future purposes. The aforesaid proposition continues to be established at naught through the Supreme Court of Pakistan from the case from the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal assistance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed towards the court in which the case has become or will be filed.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the 90 times for your department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided by the decision on the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
Article 27 on the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity while in the pay back scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is while in the crystal clear negation with the regulation laid down via the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more
There are numerous situations where death was never supposed – even more where People nominated within the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of the human being can be a tragic event. Nevertheless the death of any living being is not any fewer a tragic event.
P.C. Liability of petitioners for the said offences would be determined by the learned trial Court after sifting the evidentiary worth of the material manufactured before the same. Till then, case of
VI) The petitioner is behind the bars due to the fact arrest, investigation from the case get more info is complete, he is not any more needed to the purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him behind the bars before conclusion of trial will provide no useful purpose.
The DCFS social worker in charge from the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report towards the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
A reduced court might not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it's unjust; it may only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. If your court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it may possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow to get a judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had suffered in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children within the home. The boy was placed within an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.